I have been dithering for some while, but I think I have chosen the subject of my next book, and made a start. I just can't bring myself to begin doing 'journalistic' titles - choosing a subject, researching it and writing to the audience. However I do feel a need to attempt to 'popularize' some of the ideas and methods of my work. My focus on a Gaelic context has led me down some lightly-populated pathways, and I feel as if the work I have been doing could be of benefit to a larger section of the Neopagan scene.
So me plan is to compose yet another iteration of basic Pagan Spirit-arte skills. This outline will be more synthetic and direct than the lengthy method given in the Book of Summoning. It will be focused directly on training and empowering a magician, with less concern for Druidic theology. The Druidic (and ADF) context will be folded into a general Indo-European model that I intend to be usable by any modern Euro-Pagan practitioner.
If it sounds like I'm re-treading old material, there will be a degree of that. However I will be writing new instruction and perspectives for most of the material. I will be re-orienting the material to a more general IE Pagan, polytheist-and-animist perspective, less dependent on the specifics of ADF practice. Where the Nine Moons system, for instance might be more complete and well-mapped to ADF mythography, this model will be streamlined and direct, focusing even more directly on magical empowerment.
My presumption is that I can write a manual in core magical practice adaptable by and to much of the current 'reconstructionist' Pagan movement. We'll see; not, perhaps, an easy job. Of course being magic it doesn't have to be widely accepted to have influence...
If it sounds like I'm re-treading old material, there will be a degree of that. However I will be writing new instruction and perspectives for most of the material. I will be re-orienting the material to a more general IE Pagan, polytheist-and-animist perspective, less dependent on the specifics of ADF practice. Where the Nine Moons system, for instance might be more complete and well-mapped to ADF mythography, this model will be streamlined and direct, focusing even more directly on magical empowerment.
My presumption is that I can write a manual in core magical practice adaptable by and to much of the current 'reconstructionist' Pagan movement. We'll see; not, perhaps, an easy job. Of course being magic it doesn't have to be widely accepted to have influence...
I don't have a real working title yet... "Pagan Occultism; Esoteric Spiritual Skills for Polytheists" has all the ring of a tupperware bowl, though it gets the point across. I keep thinking about "Holy Magic" with that subtitle...
In any case, here's an excerpt from the draft of the Preface and Introduction.
Preface
Greetings,
readers. By what blessing shall I greet you? By Wisdom, surely; may you grow in
understanding. This small book is an effort to synthesize and schematize my
understanding of a Pagan spirit-arte and its application in practical magic. Of course such a
subject is vast and complex, ranging from stars to stones. It is not my plan to
create a new compendium of today’s occult knowledge. Rather I mean to offer a
simple and direct method by which a student may accomplish the basic work of
self-initiation into the mystery and power of the art.
The arts
on which I mean to draw for this method are ancient and noble. They began
at the sacrificial fires of the ancient Magi and Brahmins and were carried on
through the Wise Ones of pre-Christian Europe. The work of this book is
especially influenced by the ways of the Celtic peoples of Gaul, Britain and
Ireland, and by the lore that is thought of as Druidic. Secondarily
Scandinavian and Germanic influence plays a role. On the edge of the world of
the great traditions of classical magic, Celtic ways bring a wave of mist, Norse
ways the depth of green forests, magic tongues and signs neither Latin nor
Greek. They reveal a mythic cosmos separate from that of the Gnosis, or of
Trismegistus.
In this
manual we will address magic primarily as the art of dealing with spirits,
though we will refer to neither demons nor angels. We will teach the basics of
the invocation of a god, and the means to call to the Dead and the Spirits of
the Land. We will take some time to teach the basics – Home-Shrine work,
creating sacred space and basic invocation. We will teach simple exercises to
help ritualists open the Inner Eye and experience the presence of the spirits. While
any of this work could be accomplished in micro-groups of two or three, it is
written for a solitary practitioner at a personal altar. Also, while your
author cannot avoid a strong Celtic and Northern influence, my intention is to
make the forms and symbols of the work easily accessible and adaptable by any
Euro-ethnic Paganism.
The core
of the work is the empowerment of the magician for and through the making of
core personal alliances with the Gods, the Dead and the Landspirits. We will
discuss what kind of personal cult is useful for the working sorcerer. We will
give a method for procuring a primary personal ally-spirit from among the
non-deity beings – a ‘familiar’. Basic patterns learned in that work can be
applied for the conjuring of the Dead and the genii Loci of any region. The
making and maintaining of such relationships is the basic skill of traditional
magic.
This
book is meant to be accessible to new students, but it is really an intermediate
text. The well-prepared student will already have an established set of opening
and closing rites, know the basics of meditation and trance, and be acquainted
with the deities and spirits of their chosen Euro-Pagan pantheon. While there
will be discussion of practical magic, the work is intended especially for
those who seek a personal spiritual relationship with the gods and spirits. The
sort that opens the spirits to a modern heart, and that helps shape the
magician into being of wisdom, love and power.
Introduction
The Cult
of Sorcery – Magic and Pagan Religion
A Little
History
The
revival of the direct and conscious worship of the old gods of Europe and the
Middle East has reached a minimum of seventy years of work. If we count even
our most obvious history we can begin with Gerald Gardner’s first initiations
circa 1950. By the mid-1970s, when your author began Pagan work, the idea of
Pagan Witchcraft was firmly entrenched, and ten years later the developing
Lord-and-Lady, quartered-circle ritual style of Gardner’s witchcraft had been
made public in the “Eclectic Wicca” style of Pagan worship. Pagan festivals
created a blending and ‘culturalization’ of Pagan chants, rhythms and ritual
actions. This set of forms remains highly popular and influential at this
writing.
However there had always been
counter-currents in the Pagan revival, as early as the mid-70s. The Gardnerian
rites were a combination of material from Freemasonry and the western
‘grimoires’ – magical instruction-books – mixed with bits of folklore. Other
groups had attempted to create ritual and mythic forms based more directly on
what we know of ancient religion. Both Hellenic and Khemetic (Egyptian) efforts
were well-known even in the early days of the revival.
The impulse to reconstruct a more
authentic style of ancient ritual worship manifested in the mid-80s in both
Norse (or ‘Viking’) and Celtic forms. Asatru (veneration of the Scandinavian
gods) had been recognized in Iceland in 1972 and was making inroads in the
Neopagan community in the 1980s. Ar nDraíocht Féin (ADF) was founded as an
Indo-European Pagan religious organization in 1983, and CelticReconstructionism becomes formally visible a few years later. Hellenic, Baltic
and Slavic groups have also arisen.
For simplicity we will quote the
Hellenismos FAQ document preserved on “The Cauldron” internet Pagan forum:
“Reconstructionism, as used here, is
a methodology for developing and practicing ancient religions in the modern
world. Reconstructionists believe that the religious expressions of the
ancients were valid and have remained so across time and space. We believe that
it is both possible and desirable to practice ancient religions—albeit in
modified form—in the modern world. “
Reconstructionist
groups draw on the real scholarship of archaeology, anthropology and history
for inspiration in crafting modern rituals and customs. They are far less
likely to turn to the ‘occultism’ of the past hundred years for inspiration or
technique than are post-Wiccan practitioners. In fact some streams of this
return to traditional Paganism actively reject the religious validity of magic,
as did some elements of ancient Pagan societies. Some cultures, and some
segments of those cultures, found magic impious – a human effort to usurp
rights and powers proper to the gods. This idea arose before Christianity by
hundreds of years.
Magic
For Pagan Religion
However
no ancient polytheist society was without its magical component. When we look
at the intentions of traditional magic art we find all the fears and delights
of humankind. Love, hate, health, wealth, and luck can all be taken into the
hands of the worshipper through skilled ritual interaction with the spirits,
often aided by a priestly or
professional ‘magician’ – a ritual specialist. Those same specialists could
support the personal spiritual work of a patron, becoming in effect a household
teacher whose job included ritual work and technical spiritual support.
...unorthodox. |
At no
time in Euro-Pagan history can we see polytheist religion without a directly
corollary occult practice. Whether performed and accepted by the elites or
relegated to lower-class circles every age has seen magic available to the
general public, both to learn and to purchase a la carte. Whether performed by accepted priesthood or
market-square conjurers no ancient religion existed without a component of
occult practice.
One
hears occasional objections that the most ‘elevated’ or ‘refined’ of ancient
philosophy rejected much of popular magic and was skeptical even of
deliberately spiritual efforts such as theurgy. Magic is often considered part
of “the irrational”, which many modern seekers of spiritual truth would like to
exclude. Other modern critics repeat the ancient accusations of impiety and
hubris. It is my opinion that neither of those concerns constitute a reason to
avoid the cultivation of magic in our Paganism.
In my
efforts to think my way into the mindset of a polytheist I have found it
impossible to evaluate the meaning of religion without including the presence
of magic. Whether or not it is approved of, I know that if I have the skill and
courage I can go beyond the work of village and hearth devotion to the gods and
ancestors. I can go to the crossroad, to the old battlefield, to the lone tree
on the hill and make my own pacts with spirits. I can approach a god, and make
myself an adopted child, gaining favor and power. I can employ that power as my
will and wisdom inclines me, regardless of the opinions of philosophers.
This
potential for personal empowerment is intrinsic in animist and polytheist
religion, I think, and cannot be excised without cutting away the roots of
ancient ways. Magic was part and parcel of traditional Paganism, whether
integrated into ‘religion’ or not. The small spirits, daemons and ghosts of the
goetic conjurer were every bit as much a part of ancient polytheism as the
highest gods. For those of us who hope to restore the relations between mortals
and the spirits, magic seems almost mandatory.
Religion
for Sorcerers
Along
with those who find magic improper for Pagan religion, there are those who find
religion improper or unnecessary for magic. I find I must disagree with them as
well. As I see it there is no significant traditional style or school of magic
that is not based directly on and in a religious system. Magical practice is
intimately bound-up with religious practice, often sharing symbols, gestures,
liturgical language and implements with local temples. Of course the most
likely people to practice technical spiritual arts are those with a special
calling, and access to temples – the priesthood. Taken from the other direction
we can say that any magician who develops the work fully will be a functional
priest of his gods and spirits, whether or not he is of any recognized lineage.
The work
in this system has been developed in and for modern Euro-traditional
Neopaganism, especially in context of the Gaels. My own focus is strongly
Celtic, but the basic principles of traditional magic can be applied across the
spectrum of polytheist religion. In order to work within a traditional sphere
there are a few traditional terms that I feel should be addressed.
We will
speak of gods and spirits. By ‘god’ I in no way refer to any omnipotent, ruling
creator of the worlds. No such being exists in the mythic systems we will
address. A ‘god’ refers to one of the Great elder powers of the culture, and to
a variety of other spirits who rise to that position. My own working definition
of a god is “A being that has the power to answer worship with blessings”.
We will
speak of worship between the magician and the gods and spirits. By ‘worship’ I
do not refer to servant-master relationship, nor to any attitude of groveling
or personal disempowerment. Worship means ‘acknowledgement of worth’, and
ritual worship is the recognition of the might and wonder of the gods and
spirits, the giving of offerings, the praise of poetry, which brings a response
from those beings. On the simplest level the blessing of the spirits may amount
to direct aid in our spells and works. More generally the blessings received in
worship ritual bring the magician into harmony with the order of things, making
magic more effective. Many systems suggest that contact with the gods can
awaken power and nobility in mortal hearts, to the betterment of the world. In
many magical systems that awakening is the very center of magical initiation.
Wonderful beginning! I look forward to working through your new book. Blessings on your endeavor.
ReplyDeleteThis looks like an excellent project. I am, as you may know, particularly happy that you are choosing to approach this in a way that doesn't depend on the idiosyncrasies of the ADF cosmological approach.
ReplyDeleteI am going to map a synthetic 'Archaic Cosmos' that will look a lot like ADF cosmology. However several distinctively ADF *ritual* forms, such as the Earth Mother and the Gate, will be de-emphaised. I'll be taking a 'Ritual Center' approach to the 'gate' step that is much more IE viable, I think.
ReplyDeleteI may actually have to write new post-wiccan 'circle' rites just to keep the broad appeal...
Sounds Awesome! Looking forward to seeing it!
ReplyDelete